Re: 2008 so rules/ prop

From: Sandy Schaefer <SandySchaefer708_at_msn.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 16:12:36 -0400

Bill,

 We found advantage with certain larger blades because of chord mostly.

Mark



  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Bill Gowen<mailto:b.gowen_at_earthlink.net>
  To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com<mailto:Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com>
  Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 3:59 PM
  Subject: Re: [Indoor_Construction] 2008 so rules/ prop


  I was just pointing out a slight error in what Chris was saying. This subject has come up before relating to taking a large prop such as the 12" Ikara and cutting the middle out to achieve larger blade area. Now that the prop size has gone up to 24cm I don't believe there would be the necessity for this sort of modification. Both the Ikara SO prop and the P30 props seem to have ample blade area.

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Robert Clemens
  To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com<mailto:Indoor_Construction%40yahoogroups.com>
  Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 3:00 PM
  Subject: Re: [Indoor_Construction] 2008 so rules/ prop

  Bill Gowen enigmatically told us, "The rules don't actually say that the
  prop has to stay in one piece."

  OK, Bill. Tell us what's really on your mind here. ;-)

  Bob Clemens

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Received on Fri Sep 28 2007 - 13:12:20 CEST