--- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, Marty Sasaki <marty@...>
wrote:
>
> Mr. Moderator,
> Do I have to report results before "teaching"?
Marty,
No. I happen to know you do, or have built and flown the indoor
models of which you speak. But if you want to teach a lot that you
have NEVER actually practiced, and neither has anyone else(!), then
YES, "share" somewhere else, please. Now do you really think your
situation is analogous to the criticism I was leveling at someone
else?
>I surely hope not because
> I've got tons of stuff to "teach" that I've picked up from others>>
Good, please share your "tons of stuff." <g> We're all ears.
<<as well as my own trial and error testing.<<
Ah, speaking from your own experience. Perfect! It's only
courteous, besides.
> I really hope that dgbj goes through with things and actually builds
> something. >>
What do you think my LPP Challenge was all about? A: To give an
Omnicient Modeler the chance to establish real world credibilty.
After that, I can stand reading much advice even though I may not
agree with it. Chances are however, some real world experience will
instead turn on some lights on behalf of reality, and that's an even
better result.
<<Working in the theoretical space can lead to results that differ
wildly from real world experience. This often occurs because the
theoretical work doesn't take into account something in the real
world.>>
But it *can* take the real world into account, after some real world
experience is gained. I have no problem with theory, nor with math.
But if a guy agrees to teach me to ski, for example, but all he can
do is talk the physics of skiing, after enough of that I will call
him a fraud, until he puts on some skis.
Mark F1diddler
Received on Tue May 01 2007 - 16:52:44 CEST