Re: Re: LPP Postal Challenge

From: <dgbj_at_aol.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 15:57:06 EDT

"A REVERSE flare prop for Limited Pennyplane in 23 ft ceiling?."
 
I'm not saying I would do that nor advising anybody else to do it. I am
reserving my right to do whatever it takes to get the most efficiency out of a
prop and not accepting your prohibition against my using any kind of flaring
prop. There are several ways to reduce the climb and avoid hitting the
ceiling; flaring the prop, backing off turns or using a lower torque motor.
 
"Of course, you have until June 30 to apply your high efficiency theory
again, and again, and again... "
 
Then I'd better stop talking and get building. I followed your advice and
reviewed my flight log to look at time. I found inconsistencies in the record
that led me to a better understanding of the relationship between my energy
management theories and duration. This may simply my process of finding the
best motor. Thanks for the hint! ;-)
 
Gary Hinze



************************************** AOL now offers free email to everyone.
 Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Received on Mon Mar 26 2007 - 12:59:43 CEST

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:45 CET