I guess I'll throw my two cents in...
I would start by stating that in general, I would wish that things
stay unchanged... that being said, here is my reasoning...
Both EZB and F1L are pretty well represented... F1L, being newer and
easier to build to weight, seems to have more popularity at the
present point... And it is true that getting below the .5g weight in
EZB is difficult, to say the least... but not impossible, and well
within reach...
One of the great things about EZB is the lack of VP props, as well as
the limits on the materials used (i.e. no boron, bracing, etc...) and
that makes it (as far as I can think of...) the only event that has no
weight restrictions, and isn't affected by "hi-tech" components...
Also, it isn't imperative that you go to ultra low weights to get high
times... Aki just sent in an entry to the postal for a 23+ flight in
a 30' ceiling... and his weighed .5g...
The great fliers will almost always win no matter what... look at LPP
and who is there all the time... And I feel that there are plenty of
"beginner events" for those that want/need them... If there would be
*any* weight limit, I would think that .5g or .6g would be much
better... with .7g or above, I would probably for one not fly EZB
anymore, and just go with F1L... There is definitely a difference
between a .7g and .4g EZB in flight... and why take away the goal of
a sub .4g model for those who want it... and building a good model
light is another tool to compete with those who are better fliers...
To me at least, there is something magical about a .4g EZB flying on a
tiny strip of rubber, with a flaring prop turning at 60 rpms... But I
know it isn't for everyone... but I would hope that it is left alone
for those of us that like it as it is...
JH
Received on Wed Feb 14 2007 - 07:52:54 CET
This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:44 CET