Jim B, just to clarify, my comment in #2470 was in no manner a take
off on your post. I was only musing. By all means, all who think
ezb competition is in their future or present should weigh in,
one "weigh" or t'other--here, or Indoornews.com, or privately to
Larry Coslick. Also those those who supposedly have boxes of .7 g
ezb but won't compete because they think they're relatively too
heavy should state their preference. Just saying let's first give
individual data points to the one gathering the data. Once that's
clear, analysis is possible. (Not that any one of us can't propose
own rule change reflecting our vision, too.)
Mark B
--- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, "Mark" <f1diddler@...>
wrote:
>
> --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, "jim buxton"
> <glider902003_at_> wrote:
> d>
> > Make sure you get Max Zaluska in on this (I am pretty sure he is
not on
> > this list), Jim Richmond and Don S. All of them seem to be big
> > supporters of the light EZB style model.
>
>
> Jim,
> Max and Don S weighed in over on Indoornews.com.
>
> I think everyone should just (continue) to state their personal
> preference--what each of us would want to actually build for actual
> competition. Taken together, that should be a better indicator
> of "what best for the future of indoor" than to try to analyze what
> *would" be best for everyone else collectively, IMO.
> Mark B
>
Received on Wed Feb 14 2007 - 07:43:37 CET
This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:44 CET