Re: 2/99

From: Nick Ray <lasray_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 08:26:43 -0500

Take your time sir, from the test data I have seen its getting more
like 5/99 with age.
Mine does not seem to be any worse off, and is taking a bit more torque.
Nick Ray
On 11/19/06, Don DeLoach <ddeloach_at_adelphia.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I've recently acquired some 2/99. I know it is a good batch, but I've never
> flown with it. As I understand it is not quite as good as the best 5/99,
> but
> in the same league as 7/97 and 3/02.
>
> How is this stuff holding up to the aging process? I want to know whether
> to
> use it as soon as possible or take my time.
>
> Thx
>
> DD
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
Received on Sun Nov 19 2006 - 05:36:34 CET

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:44 CET