On Mon, 9 Oct 2006, jimmy_otool wrote:
> The "mixture" does not work fiscally, and that is the bottom line.
> As I said before, if 75% of the subscribers want an all electronic
> version, we will take it under serious consideration. I do not see
> how this is nonsensical in any way.
So far I have not subscribed to INAV, but plan to do so. A few weeks ago I
ordered the archive from Tim. Anyway, my point is: I'd quite much prefer
the electronic version over printed one. I have too many metres of old
mags in the shelf already, and I would like to store the references in the
future onto a CD. SO count me in for wanting the electronic version, and
if a printed version is required, then I'd be happy if the electronic
version would be available at the same time as the print version is
posted.
-Tapio-
Received on Mon Oct 09 2006 - 01:16:31 CEST
This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:44 CET