Re: Re: F1D pics

From: Timothy Chang <mitim3_at_sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 10:07:51 -0700 (PDT)

Yea, I did weigh the part by hanging it. I weighed all the parts at the same time so the other weights were ok. I don't think it was because of static. The wing is just as stiff as any of the heavier wings ive built in fact stiffer. I dont know why it came out so light.
   
  Tim

Nick Aikman <nickaikman_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
          I agree with Brett.

If you covered the wing/tail with OS 'roofing felt', these weights
seem extremely light to me. Did you weigh the components hanging
vertically rather than flat? And, are you sure the weighing
procedure wasn't affected by static?? The only other thing I can
think of is that you forgot to put enough wood into the structure
<g>.

Nick Aikman..

Tim, your wing seems very light to me, mine are about .24 to .26
without any covering, and about .34 or .35 with OS film. Perhaps
this is where you're off.
>
> Brett
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Timothy Chang
> To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 12:49 PM
> Subject: Re: [Indoor_Construction] Re: F1D pics
>
>
> I just reweighed the parts and it doesnt seem to add up:=(
>
> Motorstick w/stub+posts .356g
> tailboom w/fin+posts- .168g
> Wing- .268g(boron top+bottom)
> Stab- .127g
> VP prop- .24g
>
> Ok then. The total is 1.159g w/o ballast....????
>
> Tim
>
>
>
> Nick Aikman <nickaikman_at_...> wrote:
> Great looking model Tim.
>
> What are the completed component weights?
>
> Nick aikman.
>
> --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, Timothy Chang
> <mitim3_at_> wrote:
> >
> > Hey guys,
> > I'm finaly working on F1Ds for kibbie now and there are two
pics
> of mi first one since team trials in the F1D photo folder. 34"
model
> w/ VP hopefully will do some good times this year.
> > Enjoy =)
> >
> > Tim Chang
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>



         


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Received on Sat Jul 01 2006 - 10:23:00 CEST

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:44 CET