Thanks Kurt for your help. But, are you talking about UCLG or HLG? Im asking about HLG and wow! all the way to 140 foot ceiling with hand launch? Some major force there.
Tim
Kurt Krempetz <krempetz_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
Hi Tim,
Yes larger glider typically perform better or
have a better sink rate for a given wing loading. But
larger gliders can not get as high. I believe this is
directly related to surface area or skin friction.
Skin friction is very hard to eliminate or reduce.
The easiest way to turn good times is by getting
height. So I believe the correct glider size is
related to the site which the glider is intended to be
flown at. For the Kibbie Dome my modified upsweep was
able to just hit the ceiling. I think this is the
correct size of glider for that site.
I hope this helps,
Kurt
--- Timothy Chang <mitim3_at_sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I've been thinking about building gliders for
> Kibbie Dome since the first 1 hour or so is all for
> gliders and thats pretty boring for me.(no
> gliders..). For the Cat IV glider plans Ive seen,
> how come none of them aren't even close to the max
> wing area of 100 sq. in? Is it because its harder to
> launch as high? Weight?
>
> Tim Chang
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
>
>
Kurt Krempetz
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
SPONSORED LINKS
Radio controlled Power source Aircraft Flying Newcomers Outside
---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "Indoor_Construction" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Indoor_Construction-unsubscribe_at_yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
---------------------------------
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Received on Wed Apr 19 2006 - 18:19:06 CEST