Re: SO plane possessed?

From: Bill Gowen <wdgowen_at_earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 11:14:21 -0400

Dave
It sounds to me like you're right on the edge with the static stability margin. If you push it too close to the minimum then any little thing can upset the works. If it happens in competition I'd just back off a little bit more. If you don't want it to happen anymore you could shift the CG forward a little and increase the incidence as required.

Are you using a dummy motor for the other 1/3 of the motor length? If not the short motor could bend the MS enough to cause problems.
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Dave Drummer
  To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 11:04 AM
  Subject: [Indoor_Construction] SO plane possessed?


  Wednesday my students were doing some flying to ready their planes
  for the upcoming PA SO competition. They were flying 2/3 length
  loops, since our ceiling is at 19 ft., and the state site is about 28
  ft. Our best monoplane was flying pretty consistently at about 2:00,
  no touch, with Tan SS rubber. They put this plane aside and worked
  on trimming the second plane, a (new) biplane.

  After trimming the biplane, they went back to the monoplane and
  switched to some Tan II (03/02, purchased our first year of SO
  competition, saved for state competitions). Initially, they tried a
  loop cut to the same size as the SS rubber, and launched at the same
  torque, 0.35 in-oz. according to our homemade torque meter. Upon
  launch, the plane headed down for the floor. Checked the wing and
  stab incidence, they had not changed from the initial flights.
  Checked for motorstick bend with a straightedge - we didn't see a
  problem.

  They were finally able to get it to fly by launching from about 3
  feet off of the floor - the plane lost altitude for the first few
  circles, then started to climb back to to the ceiling. This technique
  eventually resulted in flights in the 2:05 - 2:15 range. Thursday,
  they flew the same plane with the Tan II, same launch torque as the
  day before, and it climbed normally without the initial loss of
  altitude! We are really baffled about this. Any ideas as to what
  could be causing this strange behavior?

  Dave Drummer
  Kutztown Sr. High School
  www.LehighWheelmen.org



  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



  SPONSORED LINKS Radio controlled Power source Aircraft
        Flying Newcomers Outside


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

    a.. Visit your group "Indoor_Construction" on the web.
      
    b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     Indoor_Construction-unsubscribe_at_yahoogroups.com
      
    c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Received on Fri Apr 14 2006 - 08:18:21 CEST

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:44 CET