Re: Re: AMA General Rules Proposals that will affect AMA Indoor
I agree with your analysis Jake.
DD
> On Jan 25, 2018, at 8:18 PM, Jake Palmer 82.jake_at_gmail.com [Indoor_Construction] <Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
> It looks like he simply added the words "and a possible national record as well" without fixing the rest of the proposal. His examples are already specifically disallowed by section 10 of the outdoor free flight rule book, and his proposed revision has no affect on contest results anyways. This means he doesn't understand the revision he's proposed, he doesn't know the outdoor free flight rules, or he's worded the proposal in an intentionally deceiving way.
>
> In any case we should be pointing this out to all the other contest board members and voting against this proposal. We should also emphasize that this will generally only affect junior age fliers, and it seems unwise to pass rules that could potentially discourage them from competing.
>
>> On Jan 25, 2018 4:33 PM, "wdgowen_at_gmail.com [Indoor_Construction]" <Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>>
>> General proposal GEN19-01 is back up on the AMA website. This is the one that requires separate flights to set records in more than one event.. It affects all types of aeromodeling where records are kept. Here's the note from Tony Stillman:
>>
>>
>> Dear Contest Board members:
>> This proposal would modify the National Records section of the General Section Competition Regulations. As such, only contest boards that have record activity as part of their competitions would be involved in voting on this proposal.
>>
>>
>>
>> This is a basic proposal, so it will follow the normal procedure for such.
>>
>>
>>
>> Tony Stillman
>>
>> Flying Site Assistance Coordinator/Competitions- Technical Director
>>
>> Academy of Model Aeronautics
>>
>> www.modelaircraft.org
>
>
Received on Fri Jan 26 2018 - 06:35:18 CET
This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:49 CET