Re: Re: 6" props for P-18

From: William D. Gowen <wdgowen_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 11:24:21 -0400

I wonder what the proposers of the P-18 event think about all the expert
interest? Probably not happy about it IMHO.


On 3/13/2017 10:11 AM, Rey Mazzocco aprivpilot_at_aol.com
[Indoor_Construction] wrote:
>
> Ray,
>
> I had posted this info on Hippocket a few days ago. Pitch measured on
> A to Z gauge at 2" radius. Pictures are on that site:
>
> Williams Bros. 5.5" 2.57g 5.9"P
> Peck 6" 1.81g 3.8"P
> Kaysun 6" 2.72g 6.1"P
> Tern Aero 6" 2.95g 6.1"P
> OS-150 5.75" 1.84g 5.3"P
> Pitsco6" 2.75g 5.1"P Measured by Bill on Hippocket
> Unknown(red) 5.5" 1.60g 6.7"P Blade shape like old Sleek Streak
> Unknown(red) 5.375" 1.79g 9.1"P Blade shape like old Sleek Streak
>
> I actually have multiples of most of these except the last one. Some
> aren't useable due to unequal pitch between the blades.
>
> The last prop has a counterbore molded into the front and a "1" molded
> on the back of one of the blades. Wish I knew where this came from.
> Anyone have any ideas???
>
> Rey
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rbharlan_at_comcast.net [Indoor_Construction]
> <Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com>
> To: Indoor_Construction <Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Mon, Mar 13, 2017 8:40 am
> Subject: Re: [Indoor_Construction] Re: 6" props for P-18
>
> I'm glad to here some responses to my post. How about you owners of
> _Pitsco_ and _other props_ weighing some (without shafts or
> hangers) and posting the results. That will be useful for preliminary
> evaluation of various props.
>
> Ray
>
Received on Mon Mar 13 2017 - 17:09:48 CET

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:48 CET