Re: Re: P-18 vs. AMA WS

From: <Warthodson_at_aol.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 18:19:01 -0400

That does not solve anything. It is still a pointless event. I have been trying to think of an other event where the best you can do is tie. So far I can't think of one. Monopoly, Ping-Pong, foot race, crocket, SO, spelling bee, dodge ball.
Bill, will you be flying P-18?
Gary Hodson
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: William Carney wcarneyjx_at_gmail.com [Indoor_Construction] <Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com>
To: Indoor_Construction <Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Fri, Jun 17, 2016 3:44 pm
Subject: Re: [Indoor_Construction] Re: P-18 vs. AMA WS



  
    
                  

Gary,


I probably never fully explained my proposal. I was too busy having to explain what a beginner gets out of a beginner event. My proposal includes a provision that if the flyer gets a flight of more then two minutes they can score that flight in LPP. What this does is provide a framework for them to get to be able to do two minutes with a P-18. Once they can do that consistently buy are getting beat in LPP they'll have motivation to build a LPP.


Bill C



On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Warthodson_at_aol.com [Indoor_Construction] <Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 
 
  
    
                  

I have been reading all the messages on the P-18 vs. SO subject & I have only one strong opinion: A 2 minute MAX creates a pointless event & I think even a beginner would agree.
Gary Hodson
 
 




    
             
  



    

             

  




    
             

  
Received on Fri Jun 17 2016 - 15:19:02 CEST

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:48 CET