Re: Re: Status of P-18

From: William Carney <wcarneyjx_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2016 20:51:45 -0400

Ray,

I propose that this event be flown as a two minute max event. No fly offs,
no tie breakers. If an contestant wants to get full credit for his/her
efforts they may but the times are scored as an official in LPP.

The purpose of this proposal is the remove the incentive of "Experts" from
flooding the event and making it unappealing to a true beginner. If you can
get one of these things to fly for two minutes three times in one day you
are probably ready to tackle a true LPP and then... By the time a beginner
has gotten enough experience to "Max Out" a P-18 he or she has set the
Indoor FF hook pretty deep.

The rules, as written, produce an airplane that make two minutes a nominal
goal. I kike seeing these models fly as they are very "indoor like" and
I've seen their appeal to the public. I just don't want to see these things
doing 5 minutes. Sure irt can probably be done but that is not the point of
the event.

Thoughts?

Bill C



On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 3:54 PM, rbharlan_at_comcast.net [Indoor_Construction] <
Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com> wrote:

>
>
> The cross proposal window is May 31 to July 15, so now is the time to
> submit any cross proposals.
>
> I expect to submit one to change the prop size max to 6", instead of 5.5".
> There are a lot more 6" props out there than 5.5's, namely at Volare who
> has six kinds of 6" props.
>
>
> I haven't checked for a specific cross proposal form at AMA, and, of
> course, if I check now, Yahoo will blow away all of this discourse and I
> don't want to type it again
>
>
> What other ideas do you have for the event, Bill?.
>
>
> Ray
>
>
>
Received on Sun Jun 05 2016 - 17:51:47 CEST

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:48 CET