Re: Re: Y2K2 vs Y2K

From: William D. gowen <wdgowen_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 17:00:39 -0500

The 34mg/100si was supposed to be Y2K2.

On 1/12/2016 2:22 PM, William Gowen wrote:
>
> According to some old info Y2K weighs 40mg per 100 si and Y2K weighs 34.
>
> On Jan 12, 2016 2:19 PM, "mkirda_at_sbcglobal.net
> <mailto:mkirda_at_sbcglobal.net> [Indoor_Construction]"
> <Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com>> wrote:
>
> That is really good to know, John.
>
> Thanks for that tidbit of information.
>
> Regards.
> Mike Kirda
>
>
>
Received on Tue Jan 12 2016 - 14:01:00 CET

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:48 CET