Re: Y2K2 vs Y2K

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: <mkirda_at_sbcglobal.net>
Date: 12 Jan 2016 11:19:13 -0800

That is really good to know, John.

Thanks for that tidbit of information.

Regards.
Mike Kirda
Received on Tue Jan 12 2016 - 11:19:13 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: William Gowen: "Re: Re: Y2K2 vs Y2K"
Previous message: john_kagan_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Y2K2 vs Y2K"
In reply to: john_kagan_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Y2K2 vs Y2K"
Next in thread: William Gowen: "Re: Re: Y2K2 vs Y2K"
Reply: William Gowen: "Re: Re: Y2K2 vs Y2K"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:48 CET