Re: Y2K2 vs Y2K

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: <mkirda_at_sbcglobal.net>
Date: 12 Jan 2016 07:43:37 -0800

Hi Gary.

In a word, Weight. Y2K2 being the lightest.

Regards.
Mike Kirda
Received on Tue Jan 12 2016 - 07:43:37 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: john_kagan_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Y2K2 vs Y2K"
Previous message: Warthodson_at_aol.com: "Y2K2 vs Y2K"
In reply to: Warthodson_at_aol.com: "Y2K2 vs Y2K"
Next in thread: john_kagan_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Y2K2 vs Y2K"
Reply: john_kagan_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Y2K2 vs Y2K"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:48 CET