Re: Weight of spacer in comps

From: Tim Hayward-Brown <tim.haywardbrown_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 14:41:58 +1030

Thanks for clarifying
cheers
Tim

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Nicholas Ray lasray_at_gmail.com
[Indoor_Construction] <Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com> wrote:

>
>
> The spacer is considered part of the airframe for weighing purposes. So,
> spacer plus model must equal 1.4g.
>
> Regards,
>
> Nick
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Nov 10, 2015, at 6:49 PM, tim.haywardbrown_at_gmail.com
> [Indoor_Construction] <Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi all
>
> How do you treat the weight of a motor stick spacer for the purpose of
> competition weigh-ins?
>
> The current rules state 0.4g rubber and 1.4g max airframe.
>
> My assumption is that for those flying old rules F1Ds, introducing a 0.2g
> spacer between the motor and the hook, makes it easy to use a new
> 0.4g motor without changing the airframe. But that the dead weight of
> the spacer is added to the airframe weight which conveniently now makes the
> airframe up to 1.4g.
>
> Is this correct?
>
> We have a comp coming up at the end of Nov and some flyers may be flying
> old rules F1Ds - so wanted to make sure I had the answer right! (I am CD)
>
> cheers
>
> Tim Hayward-Brown
>
>
>
>
Received on Tue Nov 10 2015 - 20:11:59 CET