Re: Re: Johnson City status

From: William D. gowen <wdgowen_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 11:56:40 -0400

Let me be clear that I'm not personally involved with any negotiations
at this point in time. But as far as it being a tough sell there is
another point that Fred Rash brought up. ETSU is reinstating their
football program. If the site is to be used for indoor football practice
then the scoreboard could in the way. My hopeful opinion is that the
cost of removing the scoreboard might be the ONLY obstacle to getting it
removed.

On 8/27/2015 11:46 AM, Warthodson_at_aol.com [Indoor_Construction] wrote:
>
> I think it is a good suggestion, worth pursuing. I would also be
> willing to contribute to the removal cost. It would probably be a
> tough sell. I wonder if the AMA & NFFS would be willing to lend some
> support for the idea. The AMA has a flying site program of some sort
> that might be able to help us. I am thinking both financial support &
> sales support. Maybe a multi-year agreement with ETU could help
> convince them to remove all the non-structural obstacles.
> Gary Hodson
>
Received on Thu Aug 27 2015 - 08:56:55 CEST