Re: Y2K2

From: Don Slusarczyk <don_at_slusarczyk.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 20:24:25 -0400

Then why not ban carbon VP props? Makes just as much sense as
arbitrarily banning any other aspect of the model such as covering,
boron, etc. If carbon is too heavy in the weight budget then you have to
sharpen your pencil and come up with a work around. When NASA needed to
help Apollo 13 get that square filter into a round hole, banning the
wrong filter would not fix or address the problem at hand. Now with 1.4
grams the 50mg you need is no longer an issue.


On 4/17/2014 8:13 PM, ykleetx_at_gmail.com wrote:
>
> In my opinion, having Y2K2 is an advantage. It's 50 mg of budget that
> most of us don't have. When you are out of budget on a 1.2 g model,
> having 50 mg removed makes a huge difference. I can't fly a carbon
> prop with a VP because the carbon prop is too heavy. It would be
> easier if I had Y2K2.
>
>
> -Kang
>

-- 
Don Slusarczyk
www.DonsRC.com
Home of the Wicked EDF Motors!
Received on Thu Apr 17 2014 - 17:24:27 CEST

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:48 CET