Re: Analysis of the new F1D rules

From: <joshuawfinn_at_gmail.com>
Date: 16 Apr 2014 10:30:19 -0700

Snippet from Kang:
 "There are two parts here for discussion:
 A. The proposal intends to significantly reduce the flight times
 B. ... because of the decreasing availability of proper flying sites"
  
 Well and good for discussion, but (a), it would be ridiculous to take this route for reducing flight times because partial motors were technically even mentioned in this part of the proposal, and (b), it does not appear, based on what has been posted as minutes of the actual meeting, that this aspect was even used as a primary talking point. As such, one would tend to draw the conclusion that the proposal was passed using completely different reasoning than what was in the actual proposal. That is highly disingenuous at best.
  
 -Joshua Finn

Received on Wed Apr 16 2014 - 10:30:19 CEST