Re: Re: Rubber comnparison

From: <joshuawfinn_at_gmail.com>
Date: 13 Feb 2014 12:11:17 -0800

<82.jake_at_...> wrote:
>Or you could use microfilm, or you could use a braced wing, or you could >shorten your motor tube. A heavier prop can be accommodated at 1.2g if >you're willing to make some trade offs. Being forced to make those >decisions is one of the most important parts of F1D in my opinion.
  
 Jake, maintaining F1D as a high level event is hard work, and if we want to keep the current rules, we're going to have to bite our tongues and stop making remarks like this one. I've felt like doing the same thing a time or two, but as a former outsider to F1D, I can tell you that remarks of that sort really, really damage the interest of potential participants. I'll go so far as to say that several of my fellow fliers during those days refused to try F1D or anything like it purely because of their perception that the F1D crowd have a bad attitude. I don't think that's true, but it was a valid perception--one we have to dispel if we want our craft to succeed.
  
 -Joshua Finn
Received on Thu Feb 13 2014 - 12:11:18 CET

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:48 CET