Re: Re: Rubber comnparison

From: <joshuawfinn_at_gmail.com>
Date: 13 Feb 2014 10:17:25 -0800

---In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, <mkirda_at_...> wrote:
> the 21" larger diameter made the plane fly with between a 30-45 degree > bank. It may have been extraordinarily efficient, but the plane flew
> terribly.
  
 Mike, it's worth noting that Jim Richmond has successfully flown his VD models on a 22+ in open setting. I'm not sure how all that works out, but I was flying a full 55 cm (21.5") open setting on my VD's back when I was flying VD, and there were no torque issues. If anything, the models flew better on VD than they did when I switched to VP, which imposes a lot of yaw troubles. I had to increase my dihedral, fin area, and wing offset once I went over to VP. As a side note, the current trend in VP is heading us toward 20" props. I don't know when that will come to fruition, but I've seen several fliers using 19.5" props in Cat III-IV sites.
  
 Good flying,
 Joshua Finn
Received on Thu Feb 13 2014 - 10:17:26 CET

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:48 CET