Re: RE: Rubber comnparison

From: William Gowen <wdgowen_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 11:33:13 -0500

There are several things odd about 3/99 Tan2. If there really was a
separate run of rubber in 3/99 then it's the only case I can find of
different batches being run in consecutive months.

I didn't think I had ever seen a test of 3/99 in my records but actually do
have one by Fred Tellier that shows 3/99 being considerably below 2/99 and
5/99. This is a strange result given that 2/99 and 5/99 are both excellent.
Maybe there was a small batch run as an experiment that didn't work out.

I have a small amount of rubber that is supposed to be 3/99. Maybe I'll
eventually get around to testing it.


On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:17 AM, <mkirda_at_sbcglobal.net> wrote:

>
>
> Try it out, LeRoy.
> Strip a 23" loop to 3 grams, wind 'er up and see what she does.
> Regards.
> Mike Kirda
>
>
Received on Wed Feb 12 2014 - 08:33:15 CET