Re: RE: Survey of U.S. F1D fliers before 55 cm rules change

From: Jake Palmer <82.jake_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 12:26:16 -0800

It's unclear to me how 0.6g is better than unlimited. Everything about the
rubber restriction is a negative in my opinion. It's not like outdoor
where they have maxes and field size restrictions.

It didn't make sense to me 16 years ago, and it doesn't make sense to me
now.


On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 11:01 AM, <ykleetx_at_gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> Brett, I think the 0.6g rule was a positive change. I think it is better
> than what it was, which was unlimited.
>
>
> It had the consequence of lowering performance as well as requiring a more
> aggressive launch. It also had the consequence that many people did not
> like this new style of flying.
>
>
> But if I were forced to say "positive" or "negative", I would say
> "positive."
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Fri Feb 07 2014 - 12:26:17 CET