RE: Milligram Scale

From: Jake Palmer <82.jake_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:45:12 -0800

For indoor I would say it's not sensitive enough. You want .001g, not .01g.
On Jan 24, 2014 9:39 AM, <flyingbluegill_at_sbcglobal.net> wrote:

>
>
> I was wondering if anyone could give me there opinion on this digital
> scale? It’s $18 with free shipping
>
>
>
> I was about to buy one, then all of this discussion popped up, so I
> figured I would just ask the group
>
>
>
>
> http://www.ebay.com/itm/230954980730?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1438.l2649
>
>
>
> thanks
>
>
>
> Joe M
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com [mailto:
> Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf Of *William D. gowen
> *Sent:* Friday, January 24, 2014 10:30 AM
> *To:* Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [Indoor_Construction] Milligram Scale
>
>
>
>
>
> Probably both!
>
> On 1/24/2014 10:25 AM, Warthodson_at_aol.com wrote:
>
>
>
> I am confused. Did you love your analog device or being single?
>
> Gary Hodson
>
>
> From: Thayer Syme <thayer_at_gryffinaero.com> <thayer_at_gryffinaero.com>
> Subject: RE: [Indoor_Construction] Milligram Scale
>
>
>
> I purchased my first almost 20 years ago when
> I was single, and loved it.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> <http://www.avast.com/>
>
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus<http://www.avast.com/>protection is active.
>
>
>
Received on Fri Jan 24 2014 - 09:45:13 CET

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:48 CET