Kang,
What was said in your consultation with Brett? Did you hear about the
Ukrainian Winding School?
Regards,
Nick
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 12:42 PM, <aprivpilot_at_aol.com> wrote:
> **
>
>
> Thanks for that, Kang. The rubber I have can get close to that torque,
> but at about 5% fewer turns. Either my winding method or 5/99 vs my unk
> TanII or both.
>
>
> Rey
>
>
> ---In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, <
> indoor_construction_at_yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
> Rey asked on INAV:
>
>
> ... what torque you wound to and did you back off any turns to a lower
> torque? How many turns remaining at end and torque at end of flight if you
> recorded it?
>
>
> I wound to 0.5 in-oz at 1712 turns, backed off 3 turns to 0.4 in-oz. On
> landing, I forgot count the number of turns remaining. A few minutes
> later, when I realized that I forgot to count it, I estimated that there
> were 70 turns remaining.
>
>
> It was the first flight of the motor. I've never flown well on the first
> wind and always had doubts on the rubber's output on the first wind.
> Consultation with Brett helped to dispel those doubts.
>
>
>
>
> ---In indoor_construction_at_yahoogroups.com, <Warthodson_at_...> wrote:
>
> Good question. In addition to the list below, I would add skewing the
> wing. I.E. right wing panel ahead of left wing panel to induce a left turn.
> I have observed that many (some, a few) indoor planes fly to the right
> when the prop stops providing positive thrust. It would seem to me that
> trimming the plane to fly straight or to the left when this happens would
> be more efficient.
> Is it possible to rank the effectiveness of each method of inducing a turn
> at full thrust/torque & again at low thrust/torque?
> At least superficially, stab tilt would seem to me to be efficient. What
> are the inefficiencies or down side to this method?
>
> Gary H
>
>
> Which reminds me: How do we set left thrust, stab tilt, left rudder so
> that the forces are balanced (which I assume would be the most efficient
> way to turn) ?
> From: ykleetx_at_...
>
>
>
Received on Thu Oct 03 2013 - 10:14:32 CEST