BTW
I think the record problem has been fixed.
On Sep 16, 2013 5:37 PM, "Phedon Tsiknopoulos" <phedon21t_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
> **
>
>
> Thanks, it's info that I need. Ciao, Phedon.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Sep 16, 2013, at 10:01 AM, <ykleetx_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> A rough conversion factor for Tan II or SS is
>
>
> width = 1.5 x density
>
>
> where width is in inches, and density is in g per inch.
>
>
> In Bill's case, the motor was 19.5" and 1.14g, which is .029 g/in or
> roughly 0.043" in width.
>
>
> --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, <
> indoor_construction_at_yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
> The rubber data is in a previous post. I don't measure the width of
> rubber. I go by weight per unit length. I can say for sure it is much
> larger than .032".
>
> On 9/15/2013 4:33 PM, Phedon Tsiknopoulos wrote:
>
>
> How thin do you strip the rubber, is it .032" or less, and how long is the
> loop? Thanks. Phedon.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Sep 15, 2013, at 12:57 PM, William Gowen <wdgowen_at_...> wrote:
>
>
>
> Nah. Its just luck.
> On Sep 15, 2013 3:55 PM, <joshuawfinn_at_...> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, Phedon Tsiknopoulos
>> <phedon21t_at_...> <phedon21t_at_...> wrote:
>> >
>> > WOW! Precision all the way. Nothing left to chance. I am very
>> > impressed. I guess that's what it takes to break records.
>>
>> That, and extreme care in building, lots of time diagnosing minute design
>> flaws, finding excellent rubber (with a torque curve that works for your
>> aircraft) and so on...
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Mon Sep 16 2013 - 15:59:13 CEST