Re: Re: Question...

From: Ron Williams <groncan_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 22:12:44 -0400

Before you spit, slosh some coke around in your mouth and it really works.


On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:00 PM, jannis1indoor <jannis1indoor_at_yahoo.com>wrote:

> **
>
>
> Art,
>
> I make up a solution of water and some spit and just run a brush over the
> rib at the dihedral joint and this will pull all the loose film together.
> This how we did to 30-40 years ago with microfilm and it also works with OS
> film.
>
> Jeff Annis
>
> --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, "art" <upwind120_at_...> wrote:
> >
> > ...maybe a dumb one.
> >
> > I'm learning how to use good film. I have a new Banks LPP wing and want
> to use OS on it. I can handle a tailored dihedral joint using Esaki or
> condenser paper and they come out pretty neat, but this won't be possible
> (for me, anyway) with film. I have a choice between baggy panels on either,
> or both, sides of the joint, or making the dihedral break rib flat instead
> of curved and getting a nice taut job of it. I've noticed that the tip ribs
> on most indoor planes are flat (Hangar Rats being an exception). Is this
> for aerodynamic reasons, or structural?? And If the dihedral joint is made
> the same way would it wreck anything? Is a small area of the wing with a
> taut flat airfoil worse or better than the same area curved but baggy
> (which would render the curve uncontrolled)?
> >
> > a.
> >
>
>
>
Received on Tue Aug 27 2013 - 19:12:45 CEST

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:48 CET