Bigger, braced, and covered with microfilm. Those are the reasons I prefer
65cm models.
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Yuan Kang Lee <ykleetx_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> **
>
>
> Using Steve Brown's 65 cm F1D as a reference, with a motor weight of 1.6g,
> the 65 cm F1D flies at 1.77 ft/s.
>
> The current 55 cm F1D, with the light 0.6g motor specified by the rules,
> flies at 1.70 ft/s.
>
> So the 55 cm F1D flies slower, but the 65 cm F1D is more beautiful?
>
>
> --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, joshuawfinn_at_... wrote:
> >
> > This popped up on Youtube recently, straight from 1985. While I love the
> current F1D specs and wouldn't change them for anything, this has to be the
> most beautiful form of flying ever invented:
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udK336tWekg
> >
> > Anybody know those folks?
> >
> > -Joshua Finn
> >
>
>
>
Received on Tue May 07 2013 - 10:35:06 CEST