Currently 60% have voted for either "The Builder of the Model rule should remain in place for all AMA and FAI Indoor FF events" or "The Builder of the Model rule should remain in place for all AMA Indoor FF events". I wonder if they really do NOT want to add a non BOM event (Sportsman event) or did they not understand the intend of option three? See below.
Gary Hodson
-----Original Message-----
From: John Kagan <john_kagan_at_hotmail.com>
To: Indoor_Construction <Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sat, Oct 27, 2012 9:32 am
Subject: [Indoor_Construction] Re: New poll
--- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, Warthodson_at_... wrote:
>
>
> To whomever created the polls:
> Is the correct interpretation of choice three (adding a non BOM event) that the BOM would still apply to both AMA & FAI and none of the existing events would be converted to a non BOM event. A new (currently not existent) non BOM event would be created?
> Gary Hodson
>
That's what I was thinking.
It's what I did with the "Sportsman" LPP event at USIC: those who participated in the LPP Pro/Am on Saturday could use their loaner models to fly on their own in the non-BOM Sportsman class on Sunday.
So, something along those lines.
Received on Sat Oct 27 2012 - 08:06:25 CEST
This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:47 CET