Re: BOM vs BAM

From: <mkirda_at_sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:57:45 -0000

I think the key here is to explain the intent of the rule first. Is your goal to prohibit pre-made VP hubs? Is your goal to prohibit VP hub 'kits' assembled by the builder? Figure these out first, then tailor the rule to fit.

I personally don't see the issue with builder-assembled hubs and pre-made thrust bearings. I have seen pics of an all-metal hub that was most likely done with machine tools - Did you want to prohibit that one too (thereby limiting innovation by some poor bloke who used the tools they had?) I don't think that should be the intent here.

Regards.
Mike Kirda

--- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, Tapio Linkosalo <tapio.linkosalo@...> wrote:
>
> On 24.10.2012 1:10, John Barker wrote:
> > 3 Materials may be fashioned with hand tools; for example, knives,
> > drills, files, pliers
> >
> > 4 Materials may not be fashioned with machine tools, moulding devices
> > and such other equipment as would not normally be available to the
> > average indoor builder.
>
> Does not work, as this starts to limit the construction methods that one
> can use when building. Strictly the above would mean that I would not be
> allowed to wet a piece of carbon with epoxy, set up a sandwich of
> carbon-balsa-carbon, and then wrap it around a piece of carved plywood
> to cure to form the shape of a VP screw holder, as the plywood part is a
> mold. Of course you could argue that such simple molds are available to
> the average builder, but then, how would you define what is available to
> the average builder and what not?
>
>
> -Tapio-
>
Received on Wed Oct 24 2012 - 05:57:47 CEST

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:47 CET