Re: Re: MA Column question

From: Ron Williams <roncan_at_verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 14:27:12 -0400

Like the pint now containing 14 oz., a picture is no longer worth 1,000
words.

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Scott Jackson <s_jackson34_at_hotmail.com>wrote:

> **
>
>
>
> How about a URL/pointer to pics/video at another location???
>
> Or do people have trouble getting there??
>
> BTW, do sites have counters and also how/where lookers came from i.e. to
> test effectiveness of a URL pointer???
>
>
> ------------------------------
> To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
> From: ykleetx_at_gmail.com
> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 17:04:39 +0000
> Subject: [Indoor_Construction] Re: MA Column question
>
>
>
> Especially more pics of Iacobellis ...
>
> --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, Tom Iacobellis <tiacobellis_at_...>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > More Pix
> >
> > Iaco
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
> > From: john_kagan_at_...
> > Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 16:58:32 +0000
> > Subject: [Indoor_Construction] MA Column question
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I've received word of a new length/number-of-pictures restriction. My
> decision for each column will largely depend on available content, but as
> further input, what do you all prefer - more text or more pictures?
> >
> > Effective with the February 2013 issue, the following word and picture
> count will apply to all columns:
> >
> > 1,200 words – 3 photos
> >
> > 1,050 words – 4 photos
> >
> > 900 words – 5 photos
> >
> > 750 words – 6 photos
> >
>
>
>
>
Received on Wed Oct 17 2012 - 11:27:14 CEST