Re: Re: INAV

From: Nick Ray <lasray_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 22:42:53 -0400

Sorry that was awfully written. It should have read: "I remember seeing
something with a brief history of INAV somewhere. I'm not worried about
writing a summary of the history of the publication, but it would be really
nice to know when it started."

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Nick Ray <lasray_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> I remember seeing something with a brief history of INAV somewhere, I'm
> not worried about writing a summary history of the publication but I would
> be really nice to know when it started.
>
> Nick
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Yuan Kang Lee <ykleetx_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>>
>> Nick,
>>
>> Another suggestion is to stick to things that you already know. At least
>> for now. No need to research the history of INAV. Keep things simple.
>>
>> -Kang
>>
>>
>> --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, "mkirda_at_..." <mkirda@...>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Something about the re-envisioning of the site would be good.
>> > Links for: How to get involved, how to submit content, suggestions for
>> content.
>> >
>> > Hope that helps!
>> > Mike Kirda
>> >
>> > --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, Nick Ray <lasray_at_> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hi All,
>> > >
>> > > I was staring at the blank about page on the INAV website and I was
>> hoping
>> > > to get some input about what we would to see on the about page?
>> > >
>> > > I was thinking we should have something about when INAV was founded,
>> > >
>> > > The type of content that it has had over the years
>> > >
>> > > A bit about the new site.
>> > >
>> > > Maybe something about contributions
>> > >
>> > > Other suggestions?
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > >
>> > > Nick
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:36 PM, art <upwind120_at_> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > **
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, Jake Palmer <82.jake_at_>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > You can buy a new copy of the current edition for $25 plus
>> shipping,
>> > > > > although I'm partial to the cover on my 1984 print.
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Done. Thanks,
>> > > >
>> > > > a.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Tue Aug 21 2012 - 19:42:54 CEST

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:47 CET