Re: Re: Treger and Schramm

From: Benjamin Saks <bensaks_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 23:07:27 +0200

how about getting into the new Cowboy's Stadium. It is the largest dome
building in the world.... and taller than the cargolifter.

I think the scoreboard and lights would be easy to avoid.



On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Jake Palmer <82.jake_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> **
>
>
> Maybe the US can put in a bid to host the 2016 world champs in Mosow or
> Johnson City. They aren't Lakehurt, but they're pretty darn good. 2016
> will mark 20 years since a world champs was held somewhere other than
> Slanic or Belgrade.
>
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Benjamin Saks <bensaks_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>>
>> There is no way to allow any non- US Citizen to fly at lakehurst.
>>
>> You must be a US Citizen in order to gain access.
>>
>> This is unfortunate, as it would be great to have them fly with us there.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Yuan Kang Lee <ykleetx_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> **
>>>
>>>
>>> It sure would be great if we could invite Treger and Schramm to fly at
>>> Lakehurst. Does anyone know how it would be possible to invite a German and
>>> Slovakian citizen to gain access to a U.S. military base?
>>>
>>> About why Treger and Schramm are ahead of the pack, I have absolutely no
>>> clue. Not even an inkling.
>>>
>>>
>>> --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, Jake Palmer <82.jake_at_...>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > What are Treger and Schramm doing that makes their models perform so
>>> well
>>> > in Belgrade? They're the only two people that are flying in the 37 to
>>> 39
>>> > minute range with everyone else in the 33 to 35 minute range. They fly
>>> > very different models, but I have to believe they've both figured out
>>> > something that everyone else has not. After this year's champs it seems
>>> > that thermals have been pretty well eliminated as the primary
>>> candidate.
>>> >
>>> > I think one place to start is the propeller. On the plan for Treger's
>>> 2010
>>> > model he specifies a unique pitch distribution. The main section of his
>>> > blades are 26" and the tips drop down to 20.5". Is this allowing his
>>> prop
>>> > tips to be more efficient in high pitch? Perhaps this enables him to
>>> leave
>>> > the prop in high pitch longer which drops his average RPM? Anyone else
>>> > have thoughts on this subject?
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> BEN SAKS
>> http://kck.st/KKfQsg
>> www.bensaks.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>



-- 
BEN SAKS
http://kck.st/KKfQsg
www.bensaks.com
Received on Tue Aug 14 2012 - 14:07:29 CEST

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:47 CET