To all...
 
As someone who does this for the MMM Club,  I think that what is  needed is 
someone to step up to the plate...be the responsible party and take it  
over.
 
In my "travels" I have figured out that the reason everyone wants to be a  
part of, but not he responsible party, is they don't know what they are 
getting  into nor what is involved.  Truth is, it's not that hard and there is a 
lot  of satisfaction.
 
If I read the emails correctly, all of the pieces are in place, one just  
needs to step up and have the proper publishing software and profiency..   
I.E. Microsoft Word (or equal) and probably Adobe Acrobat to cut a pdf  file.
 
The hard part is getting good input and data to use.  I used to get  cuts 
from folks that would say..."This would make a great article!"...expecting  
me to dig stuff out of the woodwork.  If it was such a great article,  
provide some backup data and such.  The job is "EDITOR" not reporter.   Too many 
folks expect you do to the work in creating articles without adding  proper 
input.  Guess what..it never happens.
 
Long story short...you want to be the editor and compiler of the INAV and  
not the originator.  You do get a lot of input from all of the email  
traffic if one cares to edit and compile it.  It is very current, the  info on 
this site.  think about it...building tips, sources of  material..name it.
 
And if anybody "b**ches" about it, tell them to step up to the plate.   
It's easy to be a critic, especially if you never have to step up or be  right.
 
And yes...it does take time...and you are a volunteer.
 
Rick
 
Rick Pangell
Editor of "The Max-Out" Newsletter  of
The Magnificent Mountain Men FF Club of Colorado  
 
In a message dated 7/26/2012 11:51:34 A.M. Mountain Daylight Time,  
flyingbluegill_at_sbcglobal.net writes:
Guys 
The cost of keeping a  website is very trivial, the main effort is 
constructing and maintaining it.  Ideally someone in our ranks would do it, 
hopefully for  free 
The cost of  registering a domain name is only around $10 per year, and 
server space is  cheap too, even if you go out and rent your own space, 
something like $50 a  year 
I have lots of unused  server space on the server I rent.  I have 750 GB of 
space that I rent  for $48 a year.  I run about a dozen model airplane 
related sites for  clubs, cottage industries, etc., some of which are heavily in 
terms of  pictures and I am only using less than 5% of the space I rent.    
I guess what I am  saying is I would be willing to carve out a wedge of my 
server and make it  available for free to whomever might be willing to do 
the website.    
The message here in  my email is the development and maintaining of the 
website itself is not  trivial, none if is hard, just time consuming.    
Here are some  websites I currently run and are part of that 5% mentioned 
above.  All of  them feature loads of high resolution pictures: 
_
http://www.cbmodeldesigns.com/_ (
http://www.cbmodeldesigns.com/)  
_
http://www.rockytopmodels.com/_ (
http://www.rockytopmodels.com/)  
_
http://www.daytonsoaring.org/_ (
http://www.daytonsoaring.org/)  
_
http://www.midohiosoaring.com/_ (
http://www.midohiosoaring.com/)  
_
http://www.lots-in-life.com/bonanza-pics/_ 
(
http://www.lots-in-life.com/bonanza-pics/)  
_
http://www.faipower.com/_ (
http://www.faipower.com/)  
_
http://www.picturejoe.com/tom-hutchison-picture-gallery/_ 
(
http://www.picturejoe.com/tom-hutchison-picture-gallery/)  
_
http://www.picturejoe.com/2004-cl-wc-picture-gallery/_ 
(
http://www.picturejoe.com/2004-cl-wc-picture-gallery/)  
_
http://www.lots-in-life.com/garden-2011/_ 
(
http://www.lots-in-life.com/garden-2011/)    
_
http://www.lots-in-life.com/basic-aerodynamics/_ 
(
http://www.lots-in-life.com/basic-aerodynamics/)   (my personal favorite) 
Like has been said  earlier, my recommendation is to keep things digital on 
a website, and keep  them free (the costs of the website are simply not 
worth charging fees  for) 
In my opinion, the  benefits to the hobby are worth far more than charging 
money to try and offset  any of the fees I mentioned above 
Joe  Mekina 
Ohio 
 
  
____________________________________
 
From:  Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com  
[mailto:Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Anthony
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2012 1:27  PM
To:  Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Indoor_Construction] Re:  INAV
 
 
 
Ah - 
Nick - the domain name is paid up through  2016. The INAV website, while 
currently down, is still somewhere on Jeff's  servers and can probably be 
recovered so it will not need to be started from  scratch - but that has to be 
confirmed with Jeff. As for the old issues, until  the site went down, they 
were all made freely available (well - the 20 some  issues that we posted), 
and I would suggest it be kept free so more people can  access that info. 
--- In _Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com_ 
(mailto:Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com) ,  Nick Ray <lasray_at_...> wrote:
>
> I would be willing to help  with keeping INAV going, but I need some help 
in
> a key few  areas.
> 
> I know very little about designing web pages and so I  would need help
> getting the site set up. Also, I am not currently a  position where I can
> support the news letter if becomes a financial  liability.
> 
> Here is what I propose:
> 
> I would  like to go to a completely digital INAV. I know this will cause
> some  problems for a few of the subscribers but I am not willing to commit
>  to printing and mailing hundreds of news letters. That seems to be the  
most
> time consuming part of the current process. If we go to a  completely
> digital platform then I don't really see the need to  password protect the
> content of the news letter, because we would not  have to charge everyone 
to
> pay for mailings. We could password protect  the old issues if that would
> make everyone if that is an issue. I  foresee creating a home page with
> links to PDFs of issues organized by  year. The site user would simply
> follow the link and download the PDF  to view the content. The user can
> print the issue if they want. Thus,  the only operating cost for INAV 
would
> be creating and hosting the  website.
> 
> I have two ideas about how to cover the operating  cost:
> 
> We used the existing money to pay for server space and  maintaining the
> domain registration. $1000 dollars should cover these  cost for several
> years.
> 
> Otherwise, we can have a  donate to INAV link on the page through paypal.
> The donations would be  used to cover the cost of maintaining domain name
> registration server  space and server space.
> 
> As for the content itself:
>  
> The only real change would be that INAV would accept both digital and  
paper
> submissions again. I would like to have maybe 4 or 5 volunteers  to help
> review submitted content. This way no one person is  responsible for 
editing
> more than 10 pages or so over per quarter. I  think that's pretty 
manageable
> work load.
> 
> Then, I  would take the content and put it together in a PDF file and 
upload
> it  to the web page. I think this process could be kept up with very  
little
> effort from any one person after the initial site is set  up.
> 
> I know this isn't construction related, so I apologize  for being off 
topic.
> I just thought this is a discussion for the whole  community. Now fire 
away
> with suggestions and whatever else!
>  
> Nick
> 
> p.s. I'm building two new VPs for Belgrade
>  
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Jake  Palmer <82.jake_at_...> wrote:
> 
> > **
>  >
> >
> > Abram mentioned that he does have money left in  the INAV account. He
> > was offering to give it back to people with  time left on their
> > subscriptions or donate it to the NFFS indoor  fund. I personally would
> > rather see the money go towards  something like what you're proposing 
here.
> >
> >
>  >
> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Anthony  <jimmy_otool_at_...> wrote:
> >
> >> **
>  >>
> >>
> >> I haven't read the latest issue of  INAV yet, but I am very sorry to 
hear
> >> this.
>  >>
> >> As a past editor of INAV (you might know me as the  guy lovingly 
referred
> >> to by Van as "that damn lawyer"), I  think it would be a shame to see 
the
> >> publication shuttered  after 40 years.
> >>
> >> So, I'd like to offer a  suggestion. When Jeff Hood and I were running 
the
> >> newsletter,  we (mostly Jeff) built a new website for INAV, to which
> >>  password access allowed subscribers access to the latest issues. I  
secured
> >> the web address Indoornewsandviews.com which was  donated to the
> >> publication.
> >>
> >>  If a few folks were interested, it would not be difficult to keep the
>  >> publication going on line - add how to videos, a few articles etc.,  
and use
> >> the site as the new publication form. The site could  be kept free (if 
Jeff
> >> continues to host on his server). If  not, there should be cash in the 
INAV
> >> account still - we  handed over about $3K when the newsletter was
> >>  transferred.
> >>
> >> If people want to see INAV  survive, it will have to be a community
> >> effort.
>  >>
> >> Best regards,
> >>
> >>  Tony
> >>
> >> PS - Just to make sure I'm not  misleading anyone, I am not 
volunteering
> >> here. I've put in my  time.
> >>
> >> --- In _Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com_ 
(mailto:Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com) ,  Jake Palmer <82.jake_at_>
> >> wrote:
> >>  >
> >> > I just read the latest issue of INAV and I'm very  disappointed to 
read
> >> that
> >> > it's being  discontinued later this year. This combined with the 
very low
> >>  > attendance at the Kibbie Dome make me concerned for the future.
>  >> >
> >>
> >>
> > 
>  >
>
size=1 width="100%" noshade color="#a7a6aa" align=center>  
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - _www.avg.com_ (
http://www.avg.com/) 
Version: 2012.0.2196 / Virus  Database: 2437/5156 - Release Date:  07/26/12
Received on Thu Jul 26 2012 - 11:13:36 CEST