Re: Re: Armorall

From: Bill Carney <wcarneyjx_at_bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 12:11:23 -0700 (PDT)

<<turn out a bit too thick for my (indoor) preference. I still use it for anything except F1d>>

Mark,

What do you use for F1D?

Bill

--- On Sat, 7/7/12, Mark F1diddler <f1diddler_at_yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Mark F1diddler <f1diddler_at_yahoo.com>
Subject: [Indoor_Construction] Re: Armorall
To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, July 7, 2012, 1:09 PM
















 



  


    
      
      
      



--- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, Bill Carney <wcarneyjx_at_...> wrote:

>

> Don't feel to bad Neil, I've been doing it that way for years. Recently I've decided to take a more systematic approach to my flying and I want to compare the effectiveness of the different lubes available and the first, easiest comparison to do is reduced versus non-reduced armorall...

>  

> Bill



Ya, the dehydrated urethane or silicone lubes all work well, but turn out a bit too thick for my (indoor) preference. I still use it for anything except F1d, or other relatively low motor weight apps. In general we probably worry too much about finding "the best" lube, but it's fun to talk about. The all-but-forgotten green soap and glycerine (ie. FAI Stick Lube) is still at least equal to any of the silicone based, IMO, but so messy to mess with.

MB





    
     

    
    






  
Received on Sat Jul 07 2012 - 12:11:23 CEST