Re: Re: Free Flight themed issue of Model Aviation

From: Don DeLoach <ddeloach_at_comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 23:04:46 -0600

I think Murph's point is that calling yourselves indoorists is simply unwise from the standpoint of appealing to a wider audience.

Furthermore I'd bet there are a bunch more *FFers who fly indoor* than "indoorists". Does that fact worry the indoorists? Not sure, but it should.


Don DeLoach

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 29, 2012, at 10:04 PM, "Mark F1diddler" <f1diddler_at_yahoo.com> wrote:

>
>
> --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, "Murph" <jb_murphy_at_...> wrote:
>
> > Fellows, if you want to ensure that the indoor phase of free flight becomes a very small part of the free flight community, keep calling your selves "indoorests".>>
>
> No one is calling themselves "indoorests", rather, it's sometimes "indoorists," coined by a eager newcomer right here on message board few years ago. Therefore a few have proudly adopted it.
>
> All are welcome to call themselves INDOORIST if they fly indoor free flight. Had no idea the term was so controversial, but it will have little effect on "becoming a very small part of the free flight community."
> Mark B
>
>
Received on Fri Jun 29 2012 - 22:05:06 CEST