Re: Duco vs. Ambroid

From: <pipercub0749_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 13:06:02 -0400

Thanks for that test, Mark! I'm really curious about the Ambroid results now.
-- 
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Segundo Zarate <segundo.zarate_at_gmail.com> wrote:
  
Wow!  Good job, Mark.  On the side I had asked Bud Romak his preference and he said "Duco".
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 7:05 AM, Mark F1diddler <f1diddler_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
  
Pretty sure if there were much difference in weight/strength between these two, it would show up in our building. However, just read an online article by a Freeflighter which claimed "Ambroid is 20% lighter than Duco." The method was to dry out equal _volumes_ of liquid cement from the tubes, then compare weights of resulting dried samples. Problem there is such doesn't account for viscosity differences. Someone should compare the strength of two _solid_ samples of equal weight. The stronger should be the winner for our purposes, since that means less glue per strength. Ok, I'll do it. I suppose tensile strength should be what's to be measured, for our purposes. Anyone have a good idea for a valid test, applying, say .5 gram of solid glue (redissolved) to some kind of joint? Don't think it should be with balsa, but something less porous. 
FWIW, 1 oz Duco liquid right out of tube weighed 27.26 grams. Thoroughly dried, same sample weighed 5.54 gram. So, 20.3% solids. Will do the same for a tube of Ambroid, but I believe viscosity can change according to marketing forces. 
No trouble, I can still use all the above glue on projects.
Mark B
Received on Sun Jun 24 2012 - 10:05:59 CEST

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:47 CET