Re: Bostonians and No-Cals

From: <Warthodson_at_aol.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 08:29:50 -0400 (EDT)

Many people seem to agree that No-Cal as it is flown at the USIC has evolved into a single design event and that participation is low. Since No-Cal is a FAC event & their rules do not include a minimum weight why not adopt the FAC rules & see if interest increases or decreases? By the way, this would not eliminate anyone from flying their Hosslers. It could even be done on a trial basis.
Gary Hodson


-----Original Message-----
From: Don DeLoach <ddeloach_at_comcast.net>
To: Indoor_Construction <Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Mon, Jun 11, 2012 9:13 pm
Subject: Re: [Indoor_Construction] Bostonians and No-Cals


  
    
                  

You summarized my thesis as "the validity of ones hobby is based purely on paid memberships". I did not say that.


Obviously there are other factors involved. But membership numbers do tell an interesting story, don't you think?


But let's not make this a contrast between FAC and indoor duration, because that's a horrible mismatch.



Don DeLoach


Sent from my iPhone


On Jun 11, 2012, at 8:03 PM, Don Slusarczyk <don_at_slusarczyk.com> wrote:




     
                  
        Then please explain what was your point for posting the 1800 number?
    
    
                       
            
You need to read carefully before restating another's written thesis, especially in a debate.
            
          
                  
    
  
    
         

    
             

  
 
Received on Tue Jun 12 2012 - 05:30:01 CEST