Re: Final thought, USIC 2012

From: thb248 <tim.haywardbrown_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 11:48:13 -0000

You guys are so lucky! Thank you Kang and all for the commentary - it is great reading and good watching the videos.
I just reflect sometimes on the fact that no one built an airship in the 30s that was good enough to fly to Australia. You guys with your 150'+ airdocks, 200' salt mines...

Maybe indoor venues should be more like golf courses... with trees and bunkers and other hazards to make it a bit of a challenge... for example - how about the chandelier in the first part of this video... http://youtu.be/3mCZ9XvT71M
:-)
cheers
Tim

--- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, "Yuan Kang Lee" <ykleetx@...> wrote:
>
> Defined by the speaker cluster to the east and the scoreboard to the west, the flyable airspace is something like 124' wide by 250 long'. The beams are 106' high in the middle and probably 100' high at the 250' boundary. In essence, the open air space is 124' x 250' x 100' high. If you fly in this space, you are free from obstacles. This is a lot of airspace.
>
> -Kang
>
Received on Fri Jun 08 2012 - 04:48:15 CEST

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:47 CET