--- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, "Yuan Kang Lee" <ykleetx@...> wrote:
d> It isn't "it's nice to be nice," but rather that a respectful discussion produces the most productive outcomes.>>
My post specified I was agreeing with Frank Burns, and yes, it's nice to be nice, and respectful--they go had in hand. My overall point, however, is that if contest-anger issues were happening at USIC, it may be instructive in behalf of the future flyers and timers to have a (yes, respectful) informative discussion about what's going wrong, especially if it's the same carelessness and/or ignorance happening over and over. In many cases, someone wanting to air an issue is not disrespeting anyone, yet "offense" is inevitably taken by the guilty party. That's unfortunate, yet it should not prevent our educating each other about the original mistakes or offenses suffered by (presumably) the contestants, CD, or whoemver. Often it's more the online print that appears terse, and people don't feel respected, when actually they are respected, but rather can't stand to be wrong in an issue.
MB
Received on Thu May 31 2012 - 15:53:16 CEST
This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:47 CET