A couple of the things that Indoor *does* suffer from is a lack of exposure and, apparently, some misconceptions.
DeLoach shares, at regular intervals, one outsider's perspective. I don't think it generally representative, but it has some useful bits to it. We just need to sort the wheat from the chaff.
Saying that Indoor is "unpopular" is, aside from being needlessly mean, pretty wrong. The dictionary definition of popular is, "regarded with favor, approval, or affection by people in general". I haven't met a person yet who wasn't floored by an Indoor model in flight. Certainly nobody disapproved.
But we are a niche hobby, and we need to continually strive to bring new people into the fold. More people = more fun.
It is fun to have people think that our models are absurdly extreme, and rely on unobtainable materials, but it isn't really true. I've sneezed while holding a model, and it didn't disintegrate. I've been on the WC podium 4 times (9, if you include the team category), and my models use OS Film and not-too-difficult-to-find wood.
The various rules aren't generally written in a very precise manner, but I don't see too many examples of events actually being "ruined". That doesn't stop some people from talking about them, though. They love to say "hard"-B, mostly because it makes a nice soundbite (like, "the building is so big it has its own weather system"). They don't remember to mention that F1L is easier EZB with a weight limit. It isn't as much fun to say.
A VP on an A-6 is a perfect example of the syndrome. The fact that nobody has done it yet hasn't prevented it from being used as an example of experts ruining the event. I don't even think it will work - I don't think the flat blades will have enough pitch range to be valuable. The only reason to make one would be to tweak DeLoach. Which, I have to admit, makes it tempting :)
We just need to make an effort to get a positive message out there, to balance out the folklore.
There certainly is a prevailing attitude that Indoor is great. It would be kind of stupid for us to spend as much time as we do if we thought it wasn't.
Nobody I know wouldn't like to see it grow, though. And, as Kang said well, "improve" apparently has different meanings to different people.
I'm not interested in saying anything that could be construed as a "flame". The last 7 times this topic has come up is enough. I actually find DeLoach's ideas motivating. They make want to get up and prove them wrong :)
--- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, "Don DeLoach" <ddeloach@...> wrote:
>
> --Extreme materials and techniques are required to be competitive (absurdly
> light and stiff wood)
>
> --The best materials are not even made anymore (Y2K, May 99, light C-paper)
>
> --Poorly written rules that are exploited by experts (VP prop on A-6, plenty
> of other examples)
>
> --A prevailing attitude that indoor is just fine and does not need to grow
> or improve.
>
>
>
> Those are the main points. The one point that Diddiler did not mention is
> sites. There are plenty of good sites but Indoorists seem reticent to attend
> meets unless there is a real chance to set records.
>
>
>
> If you are truly interested in learning why indoor is so unpopular I would
> suggest getting a focus group together of typical model airplane lovers or
> even typical FFers. The responses would likely surprise you.
>
>
>
> This is just my honest analysis. I wish none of this were true and indoor
> was hugely popular.
>
>
>
> Flame away.
>
Received on Mon May 14 2012 - 20:04:55 CEST
This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:47 CET