I'd be OK with 313 indoorists.
On 5/14/2012 5:54 PM, Don DeLoach wrote:
>
> Diddler just summed up most of what's wrong with Indoor and why
> 99.9999% of the population will never become "indoorists".
>
> DD
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:*Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Mark F1diddler
> *Sent:* Monday, May 14, 2012 3:43 PM
> *To:* Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
> *Subject:* [Indoor_Construction] Re: Condenser Paper
>
>
>
> --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:Indoor_Construction%40yahoogroups.com>, "Yuan Kang Lee"
> <ykleetx_at_...> wrote:
> >
> >
> > It is substantially harder to meet minimum weight than LPP and F1L.
> Some aspects of building A6 are easy, but three rules make meeting
> minimum difficult: 1) 1/16" wood for wing spars, 2) 1/32" wood for
> prop, 3) paper convering>>
>
> Ya, many indoor classes have one or more relatively extreme aspects.
> One famous ezb flyer doesn't do F1d due to how tightly we have to
> launch (risking destruction of motorsticks here and there.) That's
> what's good, and also bad about having so many indoor classes--you get
> to pick your poison.
>
> I don't need to find 4.0 lb wood for anything else I build, so I'm not
> going to start that hunt in order to make a long-winged 1.3" chord A6
> out of 1/16th square sticks. And the really light c paper is not even
> available last I heard. A6 functioned just FINE as a so-called club
> event, even with competing sets of rules. AMA event induction was not
> really needed (was my main comment to contest board member.) But I'm
> happy if it keeps a few others happy and motivated. Hope y'all are
> enjoying it. I might try a variable pitch A6, heheh.
> MB
>
>
Received on Mon May 14 2012 - 15:01:57 CEST
This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:47 CET