Re: Low Ceiling prop

From: <mkirda_at_sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 21:05:02 -0000

Hi, John.

So what is the thinking on props versus ceiling heights?

Is 17.5" better for lower heights due to lower torque (smaller motor cross-section), slightly longer motor, slightly faster rotation balanced with lower overall expected flight times?

I'm kind of grasping in the dark. I still expect to build just one size for awhile. Being a newbie and all.

Regards.
Mike Kirda

--- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, "John Kagan"
>
> Ok ok, I'm just procrastinating on my last bit of preparation for Kent. I still have to cover my new low ceiling prop.
>
> After extensive research and analysis, I have determined that 17.5" is the optimal diameter for Cat II, so I built one. Of course, the research and analysis consisted of Sanborn telling me that that's what Bennett flew.
>
Received on Mon Apr 16 2012 - 14:05:05 CEST