It's better for building which is why most people do it.
On 5/12/2011 8:16 AM, izgo wrote:
>
>
> thank for explanation. yes is the way i know with exception the cotton
> gloves. its a nice trick.
>
> the pictures are no close ups, but still is visible there is something
> in those covers. looks nice. Question is if better or not for flying.
>
> Ignacio.
>
> --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:Indoor_Construction%40yahoogroups.com>, "Mark F1diddler"
> <f1diddler_at_...> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:Indoor_Construction%40yahoogroups.com>, "izgo" <izgo_at_> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Yes. Thanks vey much Mr. Hood for sharing the pictures. Wonderfull
> place and models.
> > >
> > > Mark, The plane with two wings ( same as picture in yahoo home
> page) its covered with film that has wrinkled?
> > >
> > > If yes, is to complex to explain how?
> >
> > Izgo,
> > That vintage of film is no longer available (1990s Y2K) but yes it's
> crinkled. The current light (.5 micron nominal, OS film or 2004
> Y2K)film is much easier to crinkle without damage. I wear lightweight
> cotton gloves to prevent hand sweat making spots sticky. I just roll
> it up in a ball 2 or 3 times, starting at one end and rolling and
> squashing progressively to the other end. Be careful not to pop any
> film "bubbles" that may happen from wadding it all together.
> > MB
> >
>
>
Received on Thu May 12 2011 - 06:27:27 CEST
This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:46 CET