Re: New event ay USIC

From: jabiruchick <jabiruchick_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 03:38:22 -0000

It's gotta be the ambroid, that sh!#'s amazing!!

--- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, Tom Iacobellis <tiacobellis@...> wrote:
>
>
> I knew you were high on something Leo!
>
> Ha Ha only kidding
>
> It sould be a blast
>
> Best, Iaco
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
> From: leop_at_...
> Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 19:30:21 +0000
> Subject: [Indoor_Construction] Re: New event ay USIC
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I've been having fun all the time! And, I hope there are so many planes in the air on Saturday at this year's USIC that there will be no light to read the rules and the stopwatches.
>
> Leo, on a natural high
>
> --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, LeRoy C Cordes <lcordes@> wrote:
> >
> > ARE WE HAVING FUN YET ?
> >
> > LeRoy Cordes YOLO
> > Chicago, Illinois
> > AMA 16974
> > In God We Trust
> >
> > On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 19:49:12 -0000 "leop12345" <leop_at_> writes:
> > > Boy, John, you went back far in the posts in find that. The "all
> > > stab wood" comment on the plans pointed to the horizontal stab. The
> > > rudder is specifically named in the forword view so it was unclear
> > > to me, at the time, if the rudder was also a vertical stab and
> > > covered under the stab callout. That is why I brought up that
> > > point. I will take your side of this issue anytime.
> > >
> > > There are two other points to consider. The plans call out that the
> > > wing spars are 0.095" sq. tapered to 0.062" sq. at the tips. The
> > > article specifically calls out that the wing spars are double
> > > tapered. This double taper point is easy to overlook (I did so).
> > > Second, the plan shows no offset on the wing (both sides have equal
> > > length). This may present some setup challenges to the non-experts
> > > among us.
> > >
> > > Finally, I wish the motorstick and tailboom dimensions had been
> > > specified. Since the minimum weight has been reduced from that on
> > > the plans, the part weights, listed on the plans, no longer apply.
> > > I think that beginners building this plane for the USIC event could
> > > do with some guidance in that area as I know I would have liked
> > > some.
> > >
> > > Leo
> > >
> > > --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, "John Kagan"
> > > <john_kagan_at_> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Golden, thanks
> > > >
> > > > BTW Leo, you commented that the rudder outline wood size was not
> > > specified. I'd argue that the "All stab wood .062 sq." covers the
> > > vertical stab as well as the horizontal stab.
> > > >
> > > > --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, "Mark F1diddler"
> > > <f1diddler_at_> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, "John Kagan"
> > > <john_kagan_at_> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The plans say 1.97gm, and your clarification from Van Dover
> > > says 1.97gm.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The clarificobfuscation on the front page of INAV 126, written
> > > by Abram says, "1.7 gram."
> > > > > MB
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > LeRoy Cordes YOLO
> > Chicago, Illinois
> > AMA 16974
> > In God We Trust
> > __________________________________________________________
> > Groupon Official Site
> > 1 ridiculously huge coupon a day. Get 50-90% off your city&#39;s best!
> > http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4da700d48c35e6c91dm03vuc
> >
>
Received on Fri Apr 15 2011 - 20:38:24 CEST

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:46 CET