Re: Re: Kent Contest extended hours??? UPDATE

From: Phedon Tsiknopoulos <phedon21t_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 14:33:04 -0700 (PDT)

Thanks Bill.




________________________________
From: Bill Gowen <wdgowen_at_gmail.com>
To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wed, April 6, 2011 7:24:42 AM
Subject: Re: [Indoor_Construction] Re: Kent Contest extended hours??? UPDATE

 

No that's not what I meant.
 
Here are the thicknesses that are usually accepted for common films:
 
Y2K2 - .3 to .4 microns (.0000138" avg)
Polymicro - .9 microns (.0000353")
PPP (old) - .7 microns (.0000276")
OS Film - .5 microns on a good day (.0000197")
Ultrafilm 1.5 microns (.0000591")
 
This info and a lot more is in the files section for this group.
 
----- Original Message -----
>From: Phedon Tsiknopoulos
>To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
>Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 9:47 AM
>Subject: Re: [Indoor_Construction] Re: Kent Contest extended hours??? UPDATE
>
> 
>I assume that you mean 3 to 4 millionths of an inch,
>
>
>
>
________________________________
From: Bill Gowen <wdgowen_at_gmail.com>
>To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
>Sent: Tue, April 5, 2011 9:24:52 PM
>Subject: Re: [Indoor_Construction] Re: Kent Contest extended hours??? UPDATE
>
> 
>
>.3 to .4 according to my info.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>>From: Phedon Tsiknopoulos
>>To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
>>Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 1:53 PM
>>Subject: Re: [Indoor_Construction] Re: Kent Contest extended hours??? UPDATE
>>
>> 
>>On a diff. subject, do you know the thickness in microns of Y2K2 film?
>>
>>
>>
>>
________________________________
From: ray_harlan <rbharlan_at_comcast.net>
>>To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
>>Sent: Mon, April 4, 2011 6:45:25 AM
>>Subject: [Indoor_Construction] Re: Kent Contest extended hours??? UPDATE
>>
>> 
>>This issue isn't specifically addressed in the rules. There is nothing that
>>recognizes record trials flying after a contest, just the continuation of a
>>series of flights after a contest, which doesn't pertain to indoors.
>>
>>Will there be a separate sanction for the extra time at Kent? If so, the
>>two-timers rule would be in effect. If not, There could be a challenge to the
>>legitimacy of any records set, I think.
>>
>>Ray
>>
>>--- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, "Bill Gowen" <wdgowen_at_...> wrote:
>>>
>>> My further interpretation is that if you're flying an event that isn't listed
>>>as a contest event then the 2 timer rule is in effect. Is this correct?
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: ray_harlan
>>> To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
>>> Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2011 10:09 AM
>>> Subject: [Indoor_Construction] Re: Kent Contest extended hours??? UPDATE
>>>
>>> Keep in mind that if the event is a contest, only one timer is required, but it
>>>can't be the CD.
>>>
>>> Ray
>>>
>>> --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, Don Slusarczyk <don_at_> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Unfortunately that still happens. When I first became a CD (~20 years
>>> > ago) there was no such rule, all that was required was two stop watches.
>>> > The rules were changed to then two separate timers (both timers had to
>>> > be AMA members) and the CD may not be one of the timers. That rule
>>> > change was so long ago I can not see any excuse for a CD not knowing it
>>> > at this point. Perhaps the AMA should go back to mailing CDs current
>>> > copies of the rule books when they send the sanction paperwork back.
>>> >
>>> > Don
>>> >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > I wish the CD who timed me on Dec. 10, 2010 was aware of that ruling.
>>> > > To make a long story short the CAT I , CLT , UNLIMITED record that I
>>> > > broke that night was thrown out. And so was the electric record that a
>>> > > junior broke. Thanks for answering, and good luck with records, I wish
>>> > > I could make it to that site. Ciao, Phedon.
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
Received on Wed Apr 06 2011 - 14:33:06 CEST