Re: Re: Per the '10-'11 AMA rules for LPP

From: Bill Gowen <wdgowen_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2011 11:28:32 -0500

LOL!

Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone

leop12345 <leop_at_lyradev.com> wrote:

>Ministicks are by far one of the better indoor classes because they use such a small amount of rubber in their motors. So, I can preserve my precious black Perilli rubber much longer than if I flew those big fat ugly battleship-like LPP's. And, I like helicopter's, too, so the mini's are an added plus as a two-for-one class.
>
>
>
>--- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, "John Kagan" <john_kagan@...> wrote:
>>
>> --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, Tapio Linkosalo <tapio.linkosalo@> wrote:
>> >
>> > ...I can barely make my F1D turn in that gym (but needs constant steering), so a F1M turns tighter than a F1D. At least for me.
>> >
>>
>> This thread has me laughing.
>>
>> Kang dissed LPP by saying that it needs to be more like F1M
>>
>> DeLoach defended LPP as nearly perfect and dissed F1M by saying it was hard to pack, transport, and fly in small sites
>>
>> Tapio defended F1M as easy to pack and fly in small sites and dissed F1D by saying it was hard to make turn
>>
>> I shall continue the theme and say that I can make my F1D turn in small halls, and F1D's launches much better than Ministicks, which want to just nose up and helicopter around
>>
>> Who's next? (you have to defend Ministick and diss something else)
>>
>
>
Received on Sun Mar 06 2011 - 08:28:41 CET