RE: Re: Per the '10-'11 AMA rules for LPP

From: Don DeLoach <ddeloach_at_comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 00:43:07 -0700

Ministicks are cool because they are tiny, easy to pack and easy to fly in
tight sites. Much cooler than Pennyplane where you have to build Bipes and
VP props to be competitive.

 

How was that? ;)

 

 

Don D

 

  _____

From: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
[mailto:Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of John Kagan
Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2011 11:27 PM
To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Indoor_Construction] Re: Per the '10-'11 AMA rules for LPP

 

  

--- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Indoor_Construction%40yahoogroups.com> , Tapio Linkosalo
<tapio.linkosalo_at_...> wrote:
>
> ...I can barely make my F1D turn in that gym (but needs constant
steering), so a F1M turns tighter than a F1D. At least for me.
>

This thread has me laughing.

Kang dissed LPP by saying that it needs to be more like F1M

DeLoach defended LPP as nearly perfect and dissed F1M by saying it was hard
to pack, transport, and fly in small sites

Tapio defended F1M as easy to pack and fly in small sites and dissed F1D by
saying it was hard to make turn

I shall continue the theme and say that I can make my F1D turn in small
halls, and F1D's launches much better than Ministicks, which want to just
nose up and helicopter around

Who's next? (you have to defend Ministick and diss something else)
Received on Sat Mar 05 2011 - 23:43:12 CET